IMO A, B,C and D all weaken the argument EXCERT for E. explanation below
A. Town P has a larger population than Town Q. - this attacks( at least calls in to question )the assumption that the per capital driving time for town P is greater than that of Town Q
B. Most citizens of Town Q work in Town P and buy their cars there. - large number of drivers in P is in part contributed by citizens of Q who drives their (mixed group)
C. Many residents of Town P purchase second cars that they use only rarely. - RARELY USE - per capital driving time is challenged
D. Most drivers from Town P tend to drive only during the day, and only within the city limits of Town P. - Same as C above
E. The average price of cars sold in Town P is lower than the average price of cars sold in Town Q. - Correct answer, price of car does nothing to the conclusion that average driving time per capital of Q >P. Therefore, OUT of SCOPE
A. Town P has a larger population than Town Q. - this attacks( at least calls in to question )the assumption that the per capital driving time for town P is greater than that of Town Q
B. Most citizens of Town Q work in Town P and buy their cars there. - large number of drivers in P is in part contributed by citizens of Q who drives their (mixed group)
C. Many residents of Town P purchase second cars that they use only rarely. - RARELY USE - per capital driving time is challenged
D. Most drivers from Town P tend to drive only during the day, and only within the city limits of Town P. - Same as C above
E. The average price of cars sold in Town P is lower than the average price of cars sold in Town Q. - Correct answer, price of car does nothing to the conclusion that average driving time per capital of Q >P. Therefore, OUT of SCOPE