Semblance wrote:
I arrived at option B which turned out to the correct answer, only based on cancelling the ones that didn't match.
However, I didn't find option B a correct assumption somehow, maybe I missed something.
Also, am I the only one who's finding this sentence a bit awkward:
"Our justice system should render verdicts against corporations that are as large proportionally to the revenues of the corporation as some verdicts are proportionally to the income of individual defendants."
However, I didn't find option B a correct assumption somehow, maybe I missed something.
Also, am I the only one who's finding this sentence a bit awkward:
"Our justice system should render verdicts against corporations that are as large proportionally to the revenues of the corporation as some verdicts are proportionally to the income of individual defendants."
It's worded in a very academic fashion, but not incorrectly so. The reason option B is necessary is because in order to render larger awards in civil judgements against corporations, the courts have to take into consideration whether a judgement is expensive for the corporation in question. If the court doesn't know if a judgement is expensive, it's not possible for the court to effect more expensive judgements consistently, as the passage recommends.